<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quickie on social construction of gender</title>
	<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: girl from the spice isle</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-86213</link>
		<author>girl from the spice isle</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-86213</guid>
		<description>Candace i couldn't agree with you more, it not the size of the brain that matters it definitely what it's used for. Probably men have bigger brain because the brain cavity is just bigger so they need to fill it up. Doesn't mean that bigger is better. Anyhow it only takes a man to talk about size since this is whats important to a man. Anonymous has to be a man. hope he can use his big brain worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candace i couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, it not the size of the brain that matters it definitely what it&#8217;s used for. Probably men have bigger brain because the brain cavity is just bigger so they need to fill it up. Doesn&#8217;t mean that bigger is better. Anyhow it only takes a man to talk about size since this is whats important to a man. Anonymous has to be a man. hope he can use his big brain worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-84796</link>
		<author>Candace</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-84796</guid>
		<description>@ anonymous: Not sure what your point is, but it's not so much the size of the brain that matters here, as what it's used for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ anonymous: Not sure what your point is, but it&#8217;s not so much the size of the brain that matters here, as what it&#8217;s used for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-83895</link>
		<author>anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-83895</guid>
		<description>what about the scientific fact that women have smaller brains than men?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the scientific fact that women have smaller brains than men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ankita</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-83875</link>
		<author>ankita</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-83875</guid>
		<description>its really quikie ! helped to have idea about this topic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its really quikie ! helped to have idea about this topic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-66988</link>
		<author>Candace</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-66988</guid>
		<description>@ Anonymous:

It's unfortunate that boys and girls have been stereotyped into these roles, but the key now that we've come to realize this is changing it.  A simple thing like refraining from asking if a new baby is a boy or girl helps reconstruct our world as a place where people are more the same than different and gender is only a small piece of who we are, and more importantly, who we can become.  Our gender does not need to hold bearing on who we are or who we can become.  Once we slot a child into a pre-determined category it's hard to break out of that and for others to see them any other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anonymous:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that boys and girls have been stereotyped into these roles, but the key now that we&#8217;ve come to realize this is changing it.  A simple thing like refraining from asking if a new baby is a boy or girl helps reconstruct our world as a place where people are more the same than different and gender is only a small piece of who we are, and more importantly, who we can become.  Our gender does not need to hold bearing on who we are or who we can become.  Once we slot a child into a pre-determined category it&#8217;s hard to break out of that and for others to see them any other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candace</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-66987</link>
		<author>Candace</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-66987</guid>
		<description>@ Coco:

There's a difference between sex and gender -- the first *is* biological, the second is sociological.  Both are &lt;a href="http://www.trishagirl.com/ContinuumModel.htm"&gt;a continuum&lt;/a&gt; and research by &lt;a href="http://www.uis.edu/studentaffairs/safezone/resources/documents/Sexuality%20Continuum.pdf"&gt;Kinsey, Klein, and others&lt;/a&gt; describe this and its implications.  

Some women identify as more 'masculine' on this continuum than some men -- and it's fluid.  At different points in a person's life, their gender identity may lean more or less towards one end of the continuum. 

re: testosterone:  some individuals who identify as men do have more testosterone than some who identify as women, but there are plenty of women who are stronger than some men.  The argument that men are stronger than women is a fallacy that has been used to keep women out of certain types of work (firefighting comes to mind).  It also takes a very Western perspective.  In parts of the world where women are primarily responsible for physical work it is supported by the argument that women are stronger -- men just are not physically capable of bearing the same loads as women.  Again, socially constructed.

The enjoyment of activities will have much less to do with the amount of hormone in a person's body than their experiences and context -- which is always socially constructed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Coco:</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a difference between sex and gender &#8212; the first *is* biological, the second is sociological.  Both are <a href="http://www.trishagirl.com/ContinuumModel.htm">a continuum</a> and research by <a href="http://www.uis.edu/studentaffairs/safezone/resources/documents/Sexuality%20Continuum.pdf">Kinsey, Klein, and others</a> describe this and its implications.  </p>
<p>Some women identify as more &#8216;masculine&#8217; on this continuum than some men &#8212; and it&#8217;s fluid.  At different points in a person&#8217;s life, their gender identity may lean more or less towards one end of the continuum. </p>
<p>re: testosterone:  some individuals who identify as men do have more testosterone than some who identify as women, but there are plenty of women who are stronger than some men.  The argument that men are stronger than women is a fallacy that has been used to keep women out of certain types of work (firefighting comes to mind).  It also takes a very Western perspective.  In parts of the world where women are primarily responsible for physical work it is supported by the argument that women are stronger &#8212; men just are not physically capable of bearing the same loads as women.  Again, socially constructed.</p>
<p>The enjoyment of activities will have much less to do with the amount of hormone in a person&#8217;s body than their experiences and context &#8212; which is always socially constructed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-65276</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-65276</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent article that covers some of the issue I had while growing up. I would not act stupid or weak. I also would show my agner. This was considered inappropriate for a girl.  My brother who was a slob, did not have to cook, clean or do laundry because he was a boy. I hated this belief that men were more superior in women. I did not believe in many of the beliefs of my culture and because of that I was considered an outcast, and accused of thinking that I was better than any one else in my family. That was not it. It was because I saw a better future for myself that was not constrained by the beliefs of my culture. Many women were held back by these beliefs.  They were trapped with no way to get out. Marriage was their only option, and many stayed in abusive and unhappy relantioships for the sake of the family beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article that covers some of the issue I had while growing up. I would not act stupid or weak. I also would show my agner. This was considered inappropriate for a girl.  My brother who was a slob, did not have to cook, clean or do laundry because he was a boy. I hated this belief that men were more superior in women. I did not believe in many of the beliefs of my culture and because of that I was considered an outcast, and accused of thinking that I was better than any one else in my family. That was not it. It was because I saw a better future for myself that was not constrained by the beliefs of my culture. Many women were held back by these beliefs.  They were trapped with no way to get out. Marriage was their only option, and many stayed in abusive and unhappy relantioships for the sake of the family beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coco</title>
		<link>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-58657</link>
		<author>Coco</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.femilicious.com/blog/2007/05/17/quickie-on-social-construction-of-gender/#comment-58657</guid>
		<description>Although I have great respect for the different views you offer in your blog, I feel compelled to respond here.  It is quite a bold statement to say that our biology has absolutely nothing to do with our gender.  The pendulum swings back and forth in the "Nature vs. Nurture" debate, but most everyone has agreed that it is both.  Opinions vary on how much of our gender is "nature" and how much is "nurture", but it seems absurd to dismiss one or the other.  Just a simple example: men have much more testosterone coursing through their veins -- would this not have an effect on behaviour and thoughts?  This hormone makes it easier to build muscle -- would this not have an effect on what one is able to do, what physical activities are easier or more enjoyable to a person?

I like your open-mindedness, so I was surprised to read comments that seemed absolutist with regard to this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I have great respect for the different views you offer in your blog, I feel compelled to respond here.  It is quite a bold statement to say that our biology has absolutely nothing to do with our gender.  The pendulum swings back and forth in the &#8220;Nature vs. Nurture&#8221; debate, but most everyone has agreed that it is both.  Opinions vary on how much of our gender is &#8220;nature&#8221; and how much is &#8220;nurture&#8221;, but it seems absurd to dismiss one or the other.  Just a simple example: men have much more testosterone coursing through their veins &#8212; would this not have an effect on behaviour and thoughts?  This hormone makes it easier to build muscle &#8212; would this not have an effect on what one is able to do, what physical activities are easier or more enjoyable to a person?</p>
<p>I like your open-mindedness, so I was surprised to read comments that seemed absolutist with regard to this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
